Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Monday, May 20, 2013
We are MGTOW, We will not be shamed.
My personal opinion of MGTOW(Men going their own way) is a community
of risk assessors, we judge society and women based on the data and
tendencies that can be physically observed. We are an individualist
community, however we do share our findings, and knowledge with the
bluepill world. MGTOW isn't a community looking for acceptance amongst
the MRA community. Many of us don't believe the MRM will be successful
in their goal of changing the laws although, most of us do wish them the
best of luck in their fight.
So why do people become MGTOW?
Through bad experiences with women.
Or they have friends or a family member who have been raked through the coals of a corrupt system.
What MGTOW attempts to do is to turn our back on the system, we attempt to pull as many men out of it as possible in hopes to crash the system. The system is corrupt to the point where it is beyond the aid of a virus program. The virus continues to multiply as the program scans, even if you deleted some form of the virus, the virus will still persist. The virus will regroup and attack again. As long as people continue to participate in the system, the virus will continue plaguing everyone who interacts with it. .
When the system crashes, whatever the new system becomes, men will be better educated in their own and in female nature. MGTOW exists outside of the bluepill world, we are well versed in how to navigate around the virus plagued system.
So, lets dive into why NAWALT(Not all women are like that) won't work against the MGTOW community.
As I said before, we judge society and women as a collective, we do not judge exceptions to the rule. Are there women who don't abuse family courts, affirmative action for women, falsely accuse men of domestic violence or rape? Sure, you bet, but these are exceptions to the rule, the rule however, still stands.
Women as a collective have no problem destroying a mans life through the corrupted family court systems, women have no problem taking jobs due to quota's. Women as a collective have no issues with judging men as a collective based on exceptions to the rule, you know, rapists, pigs, the list goes on and on. Very few men do rape, the numbers are very miniscule.
The majority of women have been silent over 60 years about only men being subject to the draft, women struck down the ERA bill in 1982 that would have given them true equality under the law. You can't blame feminists for that one either, the ERA bill was struck down by conservative forces. We as MGTOW have a damn good reason not to trust women as a collective.
It is ironic when you think about this whole thing. Men are classified as evil things everyday, we see it in the justice system, men are always seen as the aggressors, rapists, etc, even when it is a minority of men who actually do rape. Generally speaking, when men as a collective judge women based on what the majority of women do, we see women rushing in with NAWALT, even when the data exists showing most women ARE like that.
Being the thinking man I am, I will explain why some MGTOW might hate women and why MGTOW community has every right not to trust women as a collective. I will make some comparisons along the general lines of what we can measure by using history as the barometer.
Lets state the following Hypothetical scenarios. Lets agree that anytime you have a group of people who throw another group of people under the bus, a distrust and hatred will eventually form amongst those two groups of people.
Women have thrown men under the bus for the better part of 60 years when misandric laws were passed to give women a leg up in every way possible. Now put yourself in a mans shoes, some woman appears and tells a man NAWALT.
Could we not use the same logic in these hypothetical situations?
Let me spell it out in simple terms.
It is the mid 1800's, I am an African American slave on some plantation in the south. One day, I'm in the field doing my work, a mysterious white man or woman appears, they ask me to come with them, if I go, I will be free.
Would I trust them? Considering I have been thrown under the bus by white people the minute I stepped foot on American soil. Would I trust them knowing the risk of trying to escape? Slaves who were caught trying to escape were beat to death by whip, snipped and left to bleed out, shot, hung or ripped to death by a pack of dogs that purposely were starved for this purpose. Sure there is a chance the white person could be telling the truth and not all white people are like that, but I've seen enough evidence to not trust white people as a collective by that point.
Perhaps a hatred of white people began to brew when friends I might have befriended on the plantation were beaten to death, perhaps a woman I fancied had been raped, beaten senselessly. My point? Why trust a demographic of people who have thrown me under the bus and why be surprised if hatred does form after extended exposure to this climate?
How about this hypothetical situation.
I'm a Jewish person, Nazi's told me to pack a bag, I'm going on a trip, I get shipped out of my town to some ghetto that had been cleared out to house Jews. In this Ghetto, Jews are beaten, many are executed, A Nazi comes up to me and asks me if I want to escape? Do you think I would trust them? The Nazi's have thrown me under the bus, they have killed friends and family members, extended exposure to this climate would eventually brew hatred toward the Nazi's.
We can also extend the same logic if we talk about an American Indian being thrown under the bus by the White man, would I as an American Indian trust some white man despite white men as a collective killing my tribe and running us out of our lands?
Now lets apply this logic to the current affairs.
Would I trust a woman where she can hit me at any point with her metaphorical battle axe she comes equipped with? She can ruin my life through family court or false allegation at any point she desires. The divorce and domestic violence industry couldn't exist without women feeding it. MGTOW are skeptical toward women for a reason, women as a collective have EARNED this broad label, why be surprised at the notion MGTOW might grow angry toward women?
Does it matter if MGTOW like or hate women? I would assume some do, some don't, it is really irrelevant to what the MGTOW community is about.
Shaming men for rejecting societal and women expectations will only speed up the process of more men embracing MGTOW philosophy. Gone are the days of MRA's shaming us for making an extremely calculate judgment based on divorce statistics, seeing news stories like Brian Banks losing years of his life due to false rape accusations. MGTOW's are done, we cannot be bargained with, we cannot be reasoned with, shaming us will only amount to our ranks growing and bringing about the collapse much faster than predicted.
We do not care about this society, we only participate in it as far as to survive, we don't care about the system, we will pull as many men out of it who are willing to listen and we will do it unapologetically and regardless of what women or any groups of people have to say about it.
So why do people become MGTOW?
Through bad experiences with women.
Or they have friends or a family member who have been raked through the coals of a corrupt system.
What MGTOW attempts to do is to turn our back on the system, we attempt to pull as many men out of it as possible in hopes to crash the system. The system is corrupt to the point where it is beyond the aid of a virus program. The virus continues to multiply as the program scans, even if you deleted some form of the virus, the virus will still persist. The virus will regroup and attack again. As long as people continue to participate in the system, the virus will continue plaguing everyone who interacts with it. .
When the system crashes, whatever the new system becomes, men will be better educated in their own and in female nature. MGTOW exists outside of the bluepill world, we are well versed in how to navigate around the virus plagued system.
So, lets dive into why NAWALT(Not all women are like that) won't work against the MGTOW community.
As I said before, we judge society and women as a collective, we do not judge exceptions to the rule. Are there women who don't abuse family courts, affirmative action for women, falsely accuse men of domestic violence or rape? Sure, you bet, but these are exceptions to the rule, the rule however, still stands.
Women as a collective have no problem destroying a mans life through the corrupted family court systems, women have no problem taking jobs due to quota's. Women as a collective have no issues with judging men as a collective based on exceptions to the rule, you know, rapists, pigs, the list goes on and on. Very few men do rape, the numbers are very miniscule.
The majority of women have been silent over 60 years about only men being subject to the draft, women struck down the ERA bill in 1982 that would have given them true equality under the law. You can't blame feminists for that one either, the ERA bill was struck down by conservative forces. We as MGTOW have a damn good reason not to trust women as a collective.
It is ironic when you think about this whole thing. Men are classified as evil things everyday, we see it in the justice system, men are always seen as the aggressors, rapists, etc, even when it is a minority of men who actually do rape. Generally speaking, when men as a collective judge women based on what the majority of women do, we see women rushing in with NAWALT, even when the data exists showing most women ARE like that.
Being the thinking man I am, I will explain why some MGTOW might hate women and why MGTOW community has every right not to trust women as a collective. I will make some comparisons along the general lines of what we can measure by using history as the barometer.
Lets state the following Hypothetical scenarios. Lets agree that anytime you have a group of people who throw another group of people under the bus, a distrust and hatred will eventually form amongst those two groups of people.
Women have thrown men under the bus for the better part of 60 years when misandric laws were passed to give women a leg up in every way possible. Now put yourself in a mans shoes, some woman appears and tells a man NAWALT.
Could we not use the same logic in these hypothetical situations?
Let me spell it out in simple terms.
It is the mid 1800's, I am an African American slave on some plantation in the south. One day, I'm in the field doing my work, a mysterious white man or woman appears, they ask me to come with them, if I go, I will be free.
Would I trust them? Considering I have been thrown under the bus by white people the minute I stepped foot on American soil. Would I trust them knowing the risk of trying to escape? Slaves who were caught trying to escape were beat to death by whip, snipped and left to bleed out, shot, hung or ripped to death by a pack of dogs that purposely were starved for this purpose. Sure there is a chance the white person could be telling the truth and not all white people are like that, but I've seen enough evidence to not trust white people as a collective by that point.
Perhaps a hatred of white people began to brew when friends I might have befriended on the plantation were beaten to death, perhaps a woman I fancied had been raped, beaten senselessly. My point? Why trust a demographic of people who have thrown me under the bus and why be surprised if hatred does form after extended exposure to this climate?
How about this hypothetical situation.
I'm a Jewish person, Nazi's told me to pack a bag, I'm going on a trip, I get shipped out of my town to some ghetto that had been cleared out to house Jews. In this Ghetto, Jews are beaten, many are executed, A Nazi comes up to me and asks me if I want to escape? Do you think I would trust them? The Nazi's have thrown me under the bus, they have killed friends and family members, extended exposure to this climate would eventually brew hatred toward the Nazi's.
We can also extend the same logic if we talk about an American Indian being thrown under the bus by the White man, would I as an American Indian trust some white man despite white men as a collective killing my tribe and running us out of our lands?
Now lets apply this logic to the current affairs.
Would I trust a woman where she can hit me at any point with her metaphorical battle axe she comes equipped with? She can ruin my life through family court or false allegation at any point she desires. The divorce and domestic violence industry couldn't exist without women feeding it. MGTOW are skeptical toward women for a reason, women as a collective have EARNED this broad label, why be surprised at the notion MGTOW might grow angry toward women?
Does it matter if MGTOW like or hate women? I would assume some do, some don't, it is really irrelevant to what the MGTOW community is about.
Shaming men for rejecting societal and women expectations will only speed up the process of more men embracing MGTOW philosophy. Gone are the days of MRA's shaming us for making an extremely calculate judgment based on divorce statistics, seeing news stories like Brian Banks losing years of his life due to false rape accusations. MGTOW's are done, we cannot be bargained with, we cannot be reasoned with, shaming us will only amount to our ranks growing and bringing about the collapse much faster than predicted.
We do not care about this society, we only participate in it as far as to survive, we don't care about the system, we will pull as many men out of it who are willing to listen and we will do it unapologetically and regardless of what women or any groups of people have to say about it.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)