Anger or Disappointment?

I often get accused of being angry these days, people say I can never be happy as they attempt to come up with all of these "clinical diagnoses" for me.  What people seem to fail to understand is that it is not anger, it is basically disappointment. 

Let me add some clarity to your confusion.



How would you feel if you were brought up to believe something since you were young enough to remember?  Everyone perpetuated these lies, except it wasn't on purpose or through malicious intent, they too had just bought into what society engrained them to believe.  Think back to the Matrix movie, Mr.Anderson(Neo) is told that he can take a pill that will show him the true reality but once he takes this pill, there is no going back, once this pill is taken, his entire world will be turned upside down. 

How would you feel if you took such a pill only to find out what you were led to believe was just a farce?  Would you then be angry? How about shocked, unable to act?  Would you be disappointed and saddened by what you saw?  How would you react? I didn't want to believe what I had always suspected, I needed more proof to believe before I went down this dangerous path of thinking. I thought I might have been the only person alive who had such thoughts, lo and behold, I was not.

The mere thought that "Love" was the reason why people entered relationships or marriage was a lie is a tough pill to swallow.  The lie that constantly had been whispered into the ears of many millions that said "Don't worry, she or he just wasn't the right woman or man" and coming to the realization there was no such thing.  The sadness that you feel when you see others who still believe in this lie, like children who believed in the Tooth Fairy or Santa.  You can never see the world the same after what I saw and figured out, the truth had been in front of me all this time, I can't believe how naive I had been to not of seen it earlier.


Many ask me to explain to them why "love" is a lie, look no further than what history has taught us.  If you cannot see the proof then you're simply delusional, incapable of rational thought.

Lets look at Briffault's law.

"The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place."


Keep in mind the critical point in our history as civilization. 

Long ago, the world was a chaotic place, a place of harsh elements, a place where food was hard to obtain because it had to be hunted.  Men were protectors and providers, men threw themselves into the fray without much consideration of the dangers presented to himself. The job of a man was to protect and provide at all cost, this is the very basic beginnings of why civilization as we know it came to pass.  Women wanted to be taken care of, they wanted to feel protected and be provided for, in return for this service they gave themselves to the man who provided these services to them.

Men provided a benefit to the woman, as long as the woman was with him, she was cared for and protected, much like how the "Secret Service" protects the modern President of the USA.  Men would jump in front of swords, spears, they would sacrifice themselves to protect women and children.  The term "Male Disposability" comes to mind.  This is why men go to war, this is why men are sent into burning buildings during terrorists attacks to die, this is why men froze to death at the expense of women and children when the Titantic sank.  There is a long history documenting "Male Disposability" this isn't a made up term.


In early history, life was a harsh one that required the physicality of men, the heavy lifting, putting their lives in danger everyday because complex machinery didn't exist, even today 93% of all work related deaths are males.  Women simply could not function as men in our humble beginnings, this doesn't mean Women were/are lazy, it just means they couldn't carry the burden, they needed men, without men, the world isn't where it is today.

I don't hate women, I want to make this clear, going forward, it is my intention to show Briffault's Law to be 100% accurate and any rebuttal against it is a complete and utter fallacy and further displays people still living in the matrix.

Men built the world, men developed all the comforts that we enjoy, air conditioning, cars, toilets.  Men built the commerce with malls, developed smart phones, computers, made serious advances in science, medicine.  In short, it was men who not only built civilization, they also advanced it.  There doesn't exist a single place in this world where women built a city, maintained it, cultivated technology, advanced the human race, this is just fact.

Now we fast forward to the 20th century where it was here, here we found out "love" was nothing more than a lie, we find out there is no such thing, I am going to prove it. In the 20th century, major advances in science and technology came about, life began to streamline, it became easier to do things that we couldn't even fathom 100 years earlier.  As time passed in the 20th century, machinery and overall technology improved,the days of hard physical work were coming to an end as more machines began to appear on the scene.

In the 1960's feminism kicked onto the scene, it would be sold to the world as an equal rights movement for women, it would label women as victims and men as oppressors. Deep under the surface, feminism was nothing more than an ideology, advocacy to further women's self-interest. I would say feminism is the second greatest lie ever told behind "love".  Feminism had one purpose, to create a system where the states could replace men as protector and providers, a system that had been in place since the dawn of time.  New laws had been set up to diminish the need for men, things like alimony/child support had been created, special benefits and exemptions were created, the states would set up programs to help newly single divorced mothers with funding, women would then be excluded from the draft while men must sign up for the draft to vote.

The day "love" was proven to be nothing more than a lie.

No-fault Divorce:

Signed into law on September 4, 1969 by California Governor Ronald Reagan, no-fault divorce quickly spread across the US; first to Iowa, and then to Colorado, Florida, Michigan and Oregon. By 1985, all states had enacted no-fault divorce legislation except one: New York .   In August 2010, New York's governor, David Paterson, signed into law a bill removing mutual-consent requirements and shortening the waiting period for "no-fault" divorce

The backstabbing began shortly after, divorces exploded, 70% of all divorces are initiated by women.  The states now acting as protector,provider, the circle had finally completed. Men were taken to the cleaners, enslaved by the alimony/child support, many men lost their children, many were jailed and lost their homes, many men began to commit suicide in droves.

You see, we entered a time period where the role of men had been diminished, men were being told how useless they were, life had been so simplified with advances of technology and science that now women could self-sustain themselves.  Women now had the backing of the laws, men no longer needed to jump into the fray, men no longer needed provide/protect, although many of them foolishly continued in their roles only to be backstabbed once taboo's and social stigma's died with divorce.

Briffault's law teaches us that a mans past accomplishments didn't mean a thing, it didn't matter how comfortable men made life through scientific break throughs, medical advances, technology improvements.  The bottom line is men could no longer provide the benefits, the moment it became clear, women divorced in masses. 

In a woman's mind, it is always what have you done for me lately, not what you have done for me in the past.  This explains exactly why the moment life became convenient and streamlined, backed by modern technology, laws that favored them, women rejected traditionalist roles immediately.  History has proven that the only reason why women hung around men was because of the benefits they provided to them, not because of a mystical force called "love" not because he was "the right man" or "soulmate" 

Ever hear a woman talk about potential in men?  potential means wealth, what kind of life can he provide ME with.  It was never about "love" and you people out there need to wake up and stop believing in something that never existed.  If "love" existed, then women would have never backstabbed men the moment they didn't "need" them anymore for protection, provision. 

You all have been misled, time for you to realize this, otherwise you're just another victim to the system.  I will always admire women, but I know deep down, their true goals have been made clear, I now understand their nature.  This is the first time I have had a real grasp with facts that support my claims. Reality became a whole lot more colder, viewing the world as I do now is of great disappointment.

The worst thing to see these days are whiteknights and mangina's who continue to beckon to every woman's call.  If they only knew what I knew, if they only saw what I saw, could they comprehend the truth?  I suspect the world is beginning to catch on as more men begin to opt out of the system.  This post isn't a slight or an attack at women, this is just explaining their behavior and nature. 

Women don't protect or provide for men, it is been proven, in cases when they had to, it led to divorce at an accelerated pace. If "love" was real, we would have seen compassion, not this utter betrayal which took place across all of western society over the past fifty three years.   History has shown us point blank that men are nothing but an appliance to women, once you outlive your usefulness, you are discarded, no different than an empty beer can being cast into the trash.  If "love" existed, divorces wouldn't have exploded in the manner they did. 

It can be statistically proven when women in other countries will divorce in mass, as soon as mechanization occurs. Women will reject traditionalism almost instantly, this has transpired over the past 30 years in India, China, it took twenty years to happen in South Korea. All countries were very traditional Asian countries, the divorce rates initiated by women mimic their American counterparts.  This behavior further proves Briffault's law, traditional women only accepted their roles because back then, they needed men to sustain themselves. Women traded sex for a mans utility, it had nothing to do with "love" or being "Mr. Right" or "Soul mate".   

It is a harsh reality, dark times are coming to the world.  Men are opting out of the system all together, men are going their own way, I, for one, do not blame them.